Movie: Alice in Wonderland (2010)
Oct. 3rd, 2010 02:18 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
There were some parts of this movie that I liked extremely well, and others that I didn't - overall, I would still say that I enjoyed it quite a lot despite the flaws. Some curious feminist issues going on. (SPOILER ALERT)
I was very, very disappointed that Alice wound up slaying the Jabberwock (or Jabberwocky, as they kept calling it). It was as if the text of the poem was taken as a prophecy that had to come true - but she had already violated the prophecy by befriending (rather than shunning) the Bandersnatch! I thought that perhaps she would also befriend the Jabberwock, and it would tell her that the White Queen was really evil, or at least wrongheaded in trying to destroy her sister, and the Red Queen was not so bad after all, and instead of a good-vs.-bad opposition between the two Queens, there would be a reconciliation. Because that would have been a more genuinely feminist kind of ending IMHO, celebrating values such as interdependence and community as opposed to independence and hierarchy. But no-o-o! Apparently the only way for Alice to take control of her life and become a fully adult person is to be actualized in terms of the worst of masculine stereotypes, that is, to come face-to-face with a beautiful, rare, intelligent creature, and kill it.
Speaking of masculine stereotypes, her suggestion to exploit the Chinese market (when she gets back at the end) - wow, I thought the movie was supposed to be challenging Victorian values, not whole-heartedly endorsing them! Furthermore, China was NOT untouched by Europeans or even the British at this point (Opium Wars, anyone?), so she was being woefully ignorant as well as ruthlessly capitalist-colonialist.
The White Queen amazed me. She did exercise power in a feminine way, but always in feminine ways that are considered negative, such as manipulating people to do what she wants, or brewing potions in a very stereotypical-witch way. I thought the punishment she visited upon her sister was the cruellest thing one girl can do to another (social ostracism), and at that point I really lost any sympathy I had ever had for the White Queen.
I actually sort of liked the Red Queen, although the pig thing reminded me of ... is it Suetonius who talks about one of the Roman Emperors who would have a slave killed so he could warm his feet in the entrails? (Oops, no, it was the Pictish king of Galloway mentioned in Godric, but you get the idea. It seemed quite a ghoulish allusion for a kids' movie.)
I was pleasantly surprised by how much I liked the Mad Hatter - I'm not sure what I expected, but I was quite charmed. There were moments when he reminded me of Glitch in a tender-vulnerable kind of way. And I adored Stephen Fry as the voice of the Cheshire Cat, and I was fetched withReepicheep the Dormouse.
ETA: See the discussion below for some wonderful perspectives and insights that shed a more positive and exciting light on the movie!
I was very, very disappointed that Alice wound up slaying the Jabberwock (or Jabberwocky, as they kept calling it). It was as if the text of the poem was taken as a prophecy that had to come true - but she had already violated the prophecy by befriending (rather than shunning) the Bandersnatch! I thought that perhaps she would also befriend the Jabberwock, and it would tell her that the White Queen was really evil, or at least wrongheaded in trying to destroy her sister, and the Red Queen was not so bad after all, and instead of a good-vs.-bad opposition between the two Queens, there would be a reconciliation. Because that would have been a more genuinely feminist kind of ending IMHO, celebrating values such as interdependence and community as opposed to independence and hierarchy. But no-o-o! Apparently the only way for Alice to take control of her life and become a fully adult person is to be actualized in terms of the worst of masculine stereotypes, that is, to come face-to-face with a beautiful, rare, intelligent creature, and kill it.
Speaking of masculine stereotypes, her suggestion to exploit the Chinese market (when she gets back at the end) - wow, I thought the movie was supposed to be challenging Victorian values, not whole-heartedly endorsing them! Furthermore, China was NOT untouched by Europeans or even the British at this point (Opium Wars, anyone?), so she was being woefully ignorant as well as ruthlessly capitalist-colonialist.
The White Queen amazed me. She did exercise power in a feminine way, but always in feminine ways that are considered negative, such as manipulating people to do what she wants, or brewing potions in a very stereotypical-witch way. I thought the punishment she visited upon her sister was the cruellest thing one girl can do to another (social ostracism), and at that point I really lost any sympathy I had ever had for the White Queen.
I actually sort of liked the Red Queen, although the pig thing reminded me of ... is it Suetonius who talks about one of the Roman Emperors who would have a slave killed so he could warm his feet in the entrails? (Oops, no, it was the Pictish king of Galloway mentioned in Godric, but you get the idea. It seemed quite a ghoulish allusion for a kids' movie.)
I was pleasantly surprised by how much I liked the Mad Hatter - I'm not sure what I expected, but I was quite charmed. There were moments when he reminded me of Glitch in a tender-vulnerable kind of way. And I adored Stephen Fry as the voice of the Cheshire Cat, and I was fetched with
ETA: See the discussion below for some wonderful perspectives and insights that shed a more positive and exciting light on the movie!
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 03:18 pm (UTC)So it could be Alice's participation in the introduction of England to China that results in an alternate universe that is more appreciative and less exploitive of diversity.
I have a friend here who does research on trans issues (she's the one who came and talked to my class last semester). I bumped into her yesterday and shared your suggestion for reading the character as a transboy and how much I liked that perspective. Turns out she hadn't seen the movie yet, but now she's planning to!
part 1/2
Date: 2010-10-12 08:42 pm (UTC)I am all about alternate universes. Hell, I've even come up with a whole history of Underland, from Triassic to the present, culturally, naturally, etc. etc. I absolutely agree this makes an alternate universe.
I have a friend here who does research on trans issues (she's the one who came and talked to my class last semester). I bumped into her yesterday and shared your suggestion for reading the character as a transboy and how much I liked that perspective. Turns out she hadn't seen the movie yet, but now she's planning to!
I was really worried about my interpretation, and thought about deleting my post. I just always get scared of saying it, I alwyas think people are going to say 'no it's not!' like they do when I try and tell them I'm a boy. I just get scared to say that, to get excited about 'omg Alice is a boy-like-me!' because... it's just so important to me, the idea that after all these years, after my whole life, there is finally a character--a main character, the hero--who is my gender. I can't even describe it to people, because it's... imagine growing up without your gender ever represented. AT ALL. Not represented negatively, but completely ignored. NO role models, no villains, nothing. You feel invisible, and in my case I didn't even know why I was so distressed and felt so... wrong. And then, to have this just show up? Not only a transboy, not only a fierce and pretty and strong and imaginative warrior--but also Alice? THE Alice, of my childhood? The hero of a fairy tale? It's huge.
I was so relieved when I opened up your reply and realised I wouldn't have to defend what I couldn't find words to explain. Alice just is a boy, I just looked at him and knew that this was a coming-of-age story for a young male warrior, not a woman. This... this story was about someone like me, someone who had been raised not just being someone they're not, but being the wrong gender.
Re: part 1/2
Date: 2010-10-12 08:57 pm (UTC)I'm SO glad you didn't! Because I hadn't thought of it myself, and it enriches the movie for me.
a fierce and pretty and strong and imaginative warrior [...] a coming-of-age story for a young male warrior
Alice is so *beautiful* in armor, with that golden hair rippling freely over the silver metal - it's a gorgeous, liminal image, and you've helped me find a meaning there that works.
I've been collecting odd editions of Alice in Wonderland since junior high school. At first I picked up anything unusual, including non-Tenniel illustrations, then, as I began to run out of room/money, I decided to focus on unusual texts: adaptations, abridgements, parodies, pastiches, etc. I love to see how people play with and reinvent the story; so often, they'll reinvent Wonderland, but it's not that often they do something radical and exciting with Alice. I enjoyed this movie, but I enjoy it even more now by looking at it through your lens.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 08:42 pm (UTC)I thought the prophecy thing was more about, 'but we know you can, it is written that you can, that you ARE this strong, and that you ARE a hero that can save people, and stand up against adversity and evil.' and through the story, Alice comes to realise that slaying is not about violence or hate, it is about honour, and love, and that fighting, slaying, being a warrior, going to battle and war, is not always a terrible thing. It is necessary, and it is not just the lesser of two evils, it can be an honourable thing, to have prowess in war. It's an old idea, and one that a modern world usually does not bother to understand any more, so to see it in a film, like this, treated not as something to mock and belittle, but something shining and heroic once more--it was like hearing tales of my friends who are warriors, or stories of Camelot or the heroes of ancient Greece. And more, as I said, it was about a boy like me, and a pretty, delicate boy who did not think he could take up a sword to fight, but found he could and that all his fierceness, boldness, the strength of his character--not physical strength, not a love of violence--was the strength a warrior needed.
I hope when you and your friend see the film again, you'll maybe have a better time, and I can only hope you see the wonderful, positive, encouraging fairy-tale magic that I saw.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-12 09:06 pm (UTC)I love this point you make about the strength being strength of character. And the idea of the film depicting battle as something shining and heroic is something I hadn't thought of.
I hope when you and your friend see the film again, you'll maybe have a better time, and I can only hope you see the wonderful, positive, encouraging fairy-tale magic that I saw.
I'm pretty sure she will, now that the idea has been planted - and I definitely know that I will, thanks to your courage and generosity in sharing your insights.
further ponderings!
Date: 2010-10-12 11:06 pm (UTC)If we look at Alice as being cisgendered, it's pretty obvious that she doesn't fit into the role that her mother and social circle are trying to push her into, and it's understandable that she's looking for another way to actualize herself. The movie makes it clear that the choices available to her are all unattractive. Once she's in Underland, though, she encounters powerful women like the Red Queen, the White Queen, and Molly - and she *still* chooses to be actualized as a male instead of finding a way to be powerful as a woman. Hence my disappointment.
BUT - if we look at Alice as a transboy, then the existence of powerful women in Underland helps Alice to recognize, "Hey, wait a minute, it's not just that I don't fit into the meager feminine roles available up there; there are lots more female role models here, and I still don't feel like I fit into any of these patterns. Maybe I need to rebel at a deeper level, not just against the limited roles open to my apparent gender identity, but against that gender identity itself."
Re: further ponderings!
Date: 2010-10-13 12:02 am (UTC)Speaking of gender and roles, whomever is paired with Alice is submissive to Alice, in my head. With Tarrant, or with Stayne, or with anyone--Underlandians see Alice as The Champion, there is no desire, sexual or otherwise, to have the Champion submit. One wouldn't even think of it. With Stayne, it's... well, when Alice is posing as Uum, he's posing as a girl, and my Stayne is super submissive with girls. Especially large ones, due to the macrophilia thing... aaand I could go on and on about sexuality in Underland but anyway, yes. I think Alice posing as a girl was really cool, but he could have--god, my one frustration with Alice is that he didn't take that opportunity to just grab Stayne by the cock and twist him into an ally. I FIND THIS TOTALLY ACCEPTABLE HERO BEHAVIOUR. XD I'm sure no one else does, though.